AquaNIC logo AquaNIC Banner
  Home Ask FAQ Tools About Site Map Non Java Spanish

Commercial Fisheries Newsline
Vol. XVII, No. 1 • May 1998


By Ronald E. Kinnunen
Michigan State University Sea Grant Program

Abstract: Advisory/extension newsletter for keeping Great Lakes commercial fishing and aquaculture industries informed of relevant regulations, events, opportunities and workshops.

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 

  1. HACCP Training Course scheduled for May in Baraga, Michigan
  2. Status of forage fish stocks in the upper Great Lakes
  3. Lake whitefish test positive for bacterial kidney disease
  4. Siscowet assessment in Lake Superior heads for deeper water
  5. Contaminants low in sea lamprey
  6. Fisheries and Oceans announces increased support for sea lamprey control
  7. Atlantic Ocean sea lamprey may be used in Great Lakes sterile male release program
  8. Lake Erie perch and walleye total allowable catch for 1998
  9. Phosphorus targets achieved in Lake Erie
  10. Eating fish prevents sudden heart attack
  11. Help available to answer those difficult HACCP questions
  12. Monitoring of sanitation control procedures required by law
  13. Aquaculture and HACCP regulations
  14. Aquaculture research funds available through NCRAC
  15. Michigan trout production down
  16. Red Lake Chippewa - University of Wisconsin forge aquaculture alliance
  17. Aquaculture drug approval progress in the United States
  18. Stress response in rainbow trout
  19. Michigan Sea Grant Extension Agent Directory

HACCP Training Course

Scheduled for May in Baraga, Michigan

Return to Table of Contents

The Seafood Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) regulation became mandatory on December 18, 1997. The regulation requires that certain enumerated HACCP functions be performed by an individual who has been trained in HACCP. The enumerated functions are:

Developing/adopting the HACCP plan to fit the specific needs of a processor. The HACCP plan can be of a generic type.

Reassessing/modifying the HACCP plan as a result of verification activities and any corrective actions that occur.

Reviewing the HACCP records for adequacy.

Processors may either obtain training for one or more of their own employees or they may hire trained independent contractors to perform the above functions.

To assist in the implementation of the mandatory HACCP regulation, representatives from Michigan Sea Grant Extension, MSU Extension, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Michigan Department of Agriculture will conduct a three-day AFDO/Seafood Alliance HACCP training course:

May 26-28, 1998

Ojibway Casino Resort ­ Baraga, Michigan

Jim Thannum of the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) has helped coordinate this HACCP training course and GLIFWC and will host this meeting to help us keep the course fee down.

The training will be given to individuals that can influence seafood and/or aquacultured product safety. It includes a standardized course, training materials, and trained instructors. Persons that complete the AFDO/Seafood Alliance basic course will receive a Certificate of HACCP Course Completion from the Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO). This certificate denotes completion of the standard HACCP training program for fish and fishery products as required in the regulation. A course fee of $90 will be charged and those that plan to attend the training should contact Ron Kinnunen at 906-228-4830 before the May 22, 1998 registration deadline.

Those needing lodging can contact the Ojibway Casino Resort in Baraga at 906-353-7611 or the Super 8 Motel at 906-353-6680.

Status of forage fish stocks in the upper Great Lakes

Return to Table of Contents

At the recent Great Lakes Fishery Commission meetings fishery biologists from the USGS Biological Resources Division Great Lakes Science Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Ashland, Wisconsin, presented the following forage fish stock reports for the upper Great Lakes.

LAKE SUPERIOR

The strengths of the 1977-1996 lake herring year-class in Lake Superior have fluctuated by more than a factor of 2,000. The strongest year-classes were those formed in 1984 and 1988-1990. The 1996 year-class, like the five previous year-classes, was poor lake-wide compared with the strengths of the four strongest year-classes, and little significant recruitment to the fishable stock is expected in future years. However, a multi-aged spawning population has developed in most areas of the lake as the result of maturation of the 1988-1990 year-classes, and continued persistence of the 1984 year-class. Poor recruitment under conditions of large parental stock sizes suggests that environmental conditions are more important to recruitment than total egg deposition. Lake herring have been more abundant in Keweenaw Bay and Munising areas than in other areas of Michigan waters.

Annual biomass estimates for rainbow smelt declined by more than 90% from 1978 to 1981 in U.S. waters. In 1982-1986, biomass increased until it had recovered to about 69% of that measured in 1978. From 1986 to 1994 biomass gradually declined but in 1995 it increased three-fold from 0.7 kg/ha in 1994 to 2.1 kg/ha. In 1996 rainbow smelt biomass declined 67% to a level of 0.7 kg/ha similar to that in the early to mid 1990s, and stabilized at that level in 1997. Rainbow smelt biomass in Canadian waters was 2-6 times higher than in U.S. waters in any one year in 1989-1997. Biomass in Canadian waters declined from its highest level of 5.4 kg/ha in 1989 to 1.5 kg/ha in 1992, increased dramatically in the next two years, and has since stabilized at levels near 3.0 kg/ha. Rainbow smelt biomass in Michigan waters remained stable during the late 1980s and early 1990s in contrast to Minnesota and Wisconsin. Biomass in Michigan waters increased twofold in 1995, but returned to less than 1 kg/ha in 1996 and 1997.

Lake whitefish mean biomass in U.S. waters during 1978-1997 (3.4 kg/ha) ranked behind only lake herring (7.8 kg/ha). Although not an important prey fish for salmonines in Lake Superior, lake whitefish is commercially important. Biomass of lake whitefish was low in U.S. waters during 1978-1983, moderate in 1984-1987, and increasing or high in 1989-1995. Peak biomass occurred in 1995, but then it declined 84% in 1996 and increased in 1997 to 26% above the 20-year mean. Biomass in Canadian waters fluctuated little through time. In Michigan, biomass was <1 kg/ha from 1978 to 1984, but then increased to 2.6 kg/ha in 1985. Biomass decreased from 1985 to 1986, and then tended to increase annually until 1994, when biomass peaked at 4.1 kg/ha, and declined thereafter.

LAKE MICHIGAN

The biomass of age-1 and older alewife available to the bottom trawls in Lake Michigan during 1997 was 38,500 metric tons, which was slightly higher than the 1996 biomass of 30,000 metric tons. Biomass of age-1 and older bloaters increased slightly from 262,000 metric tons in 1996 to 280,800 metric tons in 1997. Although the bloater recruitment index increased from 1996 to 1997, the 1997 bloater year-class strength was low compared with bloater year-class strengths during the 1980s. Lakewide biomass of age-1 and older rainbow smelt was estimated at 3,400 metric tons. Thus, the rainbow smelt population biomass, as estimated using bottom trawls, has continued to decline since 1992. Yellow perch reproduction was low for the seventh consecutive year; only four age-0 yellow perch were caught in trawls.

LAKE HURON

Estimated biomass of alewives decreased in 1997 to about 16,180 metric tons from 25,300 metric tons in 1996. However, adult alewife biomass increased to 10,715 metric tons. Juvenile alewives were only 34% of the total biomass in 1997 whereas in 1996 juvenile alewives made up about 60%. Bloater biomass was estimated at 19,868 metric tons in 1997 compared to 19,317 metric tons in 1996. Adult bloater biomass has declined overall since the early 1990s because of poor recruitment to the adult population in recent years. The 1997 bloater year-class appears much stronger than those observed since 1992 but is smaller than the year-classes that contributed to the population buildup during the 1980s. Adult rainbow smelt showed no change in biomass in 1997; biomass was estimated at 8,990 metric tons compared to 8,523 t in 1996. Catches of young-of-the-year rainbow smelt were smaller in 1996, but the 1994-1997 age-0 catches have been the largest seen in recent years. Catches of lake whitefish were lower than those in 1996 and less than the 1992-1996 mean.

Lake whitefish test positive for bacterial kidney disease

Return to Table of Contents

Preliminary investigations by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources indicate that in certain areas of Lake Michigan, up to 77% of subsampled lake whitefish tested positive for bacterial kidney disease (BKD) using FELISA. Additional testing is planned for 1998 and future years to determine if these levels are normal or showing any trends.

Siscowet assessment in Lake Superior heads for deeper water

Return to Table of Contents

Past assessment results indicate that there are 14 siscowet for every lean lake trout in the U.S. waters of Lake Superior. Gill net surveys of siscowet populations throughout U.S. waters of Lake Superior were conducted again in 1997 in waters 50 to 720 feet deep. Although the survey has been very successful and provided the Lake Superior Technical Committee with insightful information, the committee decided not to conduct another coordinated survey of siscowet in 1998. The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources was encouraged to conduct a survey in Ontario waters of Lake Superior.

The Lake Superior Technical Committee agreed to focus future efforts at surveying the fish community in water deeper that 100 fathoms. The survey in these waters will be a combination of bottom trawling and gill net surveys. The U.S. Geological Survey has expressed an interest in sampling the open, deep portions of Lake Superior.

Contaminants low in sea lamprey

Return to Table of Contents

In recent efforts to develop a food market for sea lamprey, Jeff Gunderson of the Minnesota Sea Grant Program reports that chemical analysis of sea lamprey from northern Lake Huron shows that they are well within FDA safety guidelines for human consumption. The University of Minnesota Trace Organics Analytical Lab of the Natural Resources Institute analyzed the sea lamprey tissue and eggs for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as total aroclors, PCBs as specific congeners, and various pesticides including toxaphene and technical chlordane. Scientists from Portugal and Spain plan to visit the U.S. in June to present the results of their marketing analysis of sea lamprey.

Fisheries and Oceans announces increased support for sea lamprey control

Return to Table of Contents

Minister of Fisheries and Oceans David Anderson announced April 1st that Canada will provide $6 million (Canadian) in fiscal year 1998-1999 to support the Great Lakes Fishery Commission's (GLFC) sea lamprey control and research program. Canada's contribution represents a $900,000 increase from last year and strengthens Canada's commitment to fund this successful and vital fishery management program. Canada's funds, combined with contributions from the United States, from the State of Michigan, and from other partners, ensures that sea lamprey control and research will continue in 1998 and that sea lamprey control on the St. Marys River will commence.

Sea lamprey control on the St. Marys River is currently the GLFC's biggest challenge. The large river produces more sea lampreys that all of the Great Lakes combined. Recent innovations in sea lamprey control technology-- including trapping, sterile male release, and a new formulation of the lampricide--will allow the commission and its agents to achieve effective control on the river.

Atlantic Ocean sea lamprey may be used in Great Lakes sterile male release program

Return to Table of Contents

The Sterile Male Release Technique Task Force has explored additional sources of male lampreys for use in the sterile male release technique. Male lampreys from the Atlantic Ocean have been proposed for use in the Great Lakes to supplement the supply of lampreys currently available. Use of Atlantic origin lampreys offer the following advantages:

  • With success of planned control efforts on the St. Marys River, the supply of lampreys in northern lakes Huron and Michigan will decline. The average cost to obtain lampreys for sterilization will change from the current average of $6 to about $16. The estimated cost to obtain Atlantic origin lampreys will become favorable at about $10.
  • Additional lampreys will improve effectiveness of the technique in the St. Marys River. The Sterile Male Release Technique Task Force has established an optimum ratio of 4:1 sterile to untreated male lampreys for the river. To meet this goal an additional 10,000 male lampreys are required annually over the current supply.
  • Additional lampreys will improve effectiveness of the technique in the Bad River and will provide options to expand the technique into additional areas of the Great Lakes.

The Task Force has determined that importation of Atlantic origin lampreys for sterilization and release in the Great Lakes is feasible and cost effective, but involves some risk. It is the consensus of the Task Force that the risk of importation of undesirable genetic traits is low enough to be acceptable. They are unsure of the potential to import disease and await a response from the Fish Health Committee. They do not expect significant opposition from the public.

The Task Force recommends that any further planning and research be focused on resolution of potential risks until the Commission makes a decision on importation of Atlantic origin lampreys. If the Commission requests further research to define the level of risk, they ask that it provide some guidance on the level of risk that is acceptable.

Lake Erie perch and walleye total allowable catch for 1998

Return to Table of Contents

Fishery managers from Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Ontario gathered recently in Niagara Falls, Ontario, to focus attention on the state of the Lake Erie fishery and to decide the total allowable catch (TAC) for 1998.

Based on research and reports from its technical committees and noting a poor 1997 yellow perch year-class, the Lake Erie Committee held the TAC for yellow perch steady in 1998 at 7.44 million pounds. The 1998 yellow perch fishery will depend on the 1995 year-class and a large, although slow growing, 1996 year-class. The 1997 year-class is weak and will not significantly add to the 1999 population. The Lake Erie Committee feels that because of these factors, it is important to hold the total allowable catch steady in 1998 and to closely monitor the situation for possible adjustment next year.

The committee also agreed to a walleye TAC of 10.3 million fish in 1998, a slight increase from 9.7 million fish in 1997. In this decision, the Lake Erie Committee recognized that the walleye population is healthy and increasing, but also recognized that sport fishing success has been reduced in recent years, particularly in eastern Lake Erie. The existing walleye population in Lake Erie is healthy, though poor walleye year-classes a few years ago have created a situation where recruitment remains moderate. The committee is able to recommend a slight increase in the catch because the 1996 year-class will contribute approximately 30 million fish in 1998 and because the 1997 year-class is promising.

Phosphorus targets achieved in Lake Erie

Return to Table of Contents

Representatives from the five fisheries agencies on Lake Erie don't want changes to phosphorus target levels in Lake Erie until a more thorough scientific review of the situation can be undertaken. Fisheries managers noted that the significant reductions in phosphorus have benefitted Lake Erie but warned that further reductions could have a serious negative impact on the fish stocks in the lake.

They also stated that it would be irresponsible to advocate a position of adding phosphorus

to the lake to increase fish production until there is clear scientific evidence that this would be an appropriate strategy. The Committee strongly encouraged all relevant agencies to commit resources and to work together to undertake a scientific review of phosphorus management on Lake Erie.

Phosphorus is the principal nutrient controlling primary productivity in freshwater ecosystems. Primary productivity has a direct and major influence on fish production. Too much phosphorus can lead to excessive amounts of algae while too little phosphorus can reduce the capability of a lake to support large amounts of fish.

Recent declines in the abundance of some of Lake Erie's most important fish species, such as yellow perch, rainbow smelt and walleye, are thought to be strongly related to the combined efforts of reduced phosphorus loadings and the invasion of zebra and quagga mussels. A considerable amount of science needs to be devoted to understanding and unraveling the relative and cumulative effects of mussels and phosphorus concentrations on the fish production of Lake Erie.

Further reductions in phosphorus levels may result in a cleaner, clearer lake but could result in a change in the mix of fish species in the lake and a reduction in the abundance of fish. Lake Erie currently supports a thriving sport and commercial fishery that provides important economic and social benefits to both Canada and the United States.

Eating fish prevents sudden heart attack

Return to Table of Contents

Middle-aged men who eat a weekly meal of "fatty" fish such as tuna, salmon, mackerel or shellfish cut in half their risk of suffering a sudden, deadly heart attack. Researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston studied 11 years worth of data on the dietary habits and health of 20,551 male physicians, aged 40 to 84 years, and found that those who ate seafood containing the n-3 fatty acid at least once a week had a 52 percent lower risk of sudden cardiac death compared to those who ate fish less than once a month.

Approximately 250,000 sudden cardiac deaths occur in the United States each year, and more than half the victims did not have any previous history of heart disease.

The health benefits enjoyed by consumers of fish may partly be attributed to their healthier habits in general, as they were more likely to exercise regularly and take antioxidant vitamins, the report said.

However, the data gleaned from the Physicians' Health Study, begun in 1982, did not show any beneficial relationship between fish consumption and the overall risk of heart attack, coronary heart disease death or non-sudden cardiac death, the report written by the hospital's Christine Albert said.

Also, the protective heart benefit from eating fish did not increase for subjects who ate more than one meal of fish a week, indicating a threshold effect, Albert wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

A previous study of 1,800 Western Electric workers that began in 1957 showed regular meals of fish lowered the overall risk of heart disease by 38 percent and of heart attack by 60 percent compared to men who ate red meat.

The disparity regarding heart disease between the two studies may be due to differing criteria for what constitutes ''sudden death,'' Dutch researcher Daan Kromhout wrote in an accompanying editorial.

''The existing evidence suggests that consumption of fish once a week will help prevent coronary heart disease and therefore should be a component of a healthy diet,'' concluded Kromhout of the Netherlands' National Institute of Public Health and the Environment.

''It also appears justified to advise patients with cardiac disease to consume two fish servings per week. These levels of fish consumption not only may help reduce coronary heart disease mortality but also may favorably influence all-cause mortality,'' Kromhout wrote.

Help available to answer those difficult HACCP questions

Return to Table of Contents

If you have Seafood HACCP questions for the FDA you can call 202-418-3150 during regular business hours (8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. EST) or you can E-mail questions to: seafood@bangate.fda.gov. The questions that are received and their answers will be used to update the "HACCP REGULATIONS FOR FISH & FISHERY PRODUCTS, QUESTIONS & ANSWERS" location on the FDA web site. To get to this site just go to: www.fda.gov then to Foods, then to seafood. This site contains the answers to many questions at this time and I recommend that you take a look at it if you have access to the Internet.

Monitoring of sanitation control procedures required by law

Return to Table of Contents

Most of you who participated in one of our recent Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) workshops should now have your HACCP Plan up and running. You should also be aware that you must address sanitation control procedures at your facility. Although not required by law, each processor should have and implement a written sanitation standard operating procedure (SSOP) or similar document that is specific to each location where fish and fishery products are produced. The SSOP should specify how the processor will meet those sanitation conditions and practices that are to be monitored.

The law does require each processor to monitor the conditions and practices during processing with sufficient frequency to ensure, at a minimum, conformance with those conditions and practices that are both appropriate to the plant and the food being processed and relate to the following:

  1. Safety of the water that comes into contact with food or food contact surfaces, or is used in the manufacture of ice;
  2. Condition and cleanliness of food contact surfaces, including utensils, gloves, and outer garments;
  3. Prevention of cross-contamination from insanitary objects to food, food packaging material, and other food contact surfaces, including utensils, gloves, and outer garments, and from raw product to cooked product;
  4. Maintenance of hand washing, hand sanitizing, and toilet facilities;
  5. Protection of food, food packaging material, and food contact surfaces from adulteration with lubricants, fuel, pesticides, cleaning compounds, sanitizing agents, condensate, and other chemical, physical, and biological contaminants;
  6. Proper labeling, storage, and use of toxic compounds;
  7. Control of employee health conditions that could result in the microbiological contamination of food, food packaging materials, and food contact surfaces; and
  8. Exclusion of pests from the food plant.

The processor shall correct in a timely manner, those conditions and practices that are not met.

Each processor shall maintain sanitation control records that, at a minimum, document the monitoring and corrections prescribed by the eight areas listed above.

Sanitation controls may be included in the HACCP plan; however, to the extent that they are monitored in accordance with eight areas listed, they need not be included in the HACCP plan.

If you have any specific questions regarding your HACCP plan or sanitation standard operating procedure, feel free to contact Ron Kinnunen (906-228-4830).

Aquaculture and HACCP regulations

Return to Table of Contents

The following scenarios provide clarification on several issues specific to aquaculture producers who are involved in "custom processing" on a small scale directly to end-users (customer-consumers) and live fish haulers. These practices are EXEMPT from the FDA federal HACCP regulations, but may need to comply with specific state and/or local regulations. Also clarified is the seafood HACCP regulatory status for aquaculture producers who box and ice whole fish for delivery or pick-up for marketing purposes. One issue that can trigger the need to comply with the federal seafood HACCP inspection regulations is "holding." Although there is no clear definition of this term in the final rule, holding product on ice for extended periods (i.e., more than 24 hours) during times when markets are open, can be considered "holding."

SCENARIO 1

In the marketing of several fish species, the cultured fish are sold whole and packed on ice by the aquaculture producer for sales to seafood wholesalers or retailers. The whole fish are not processed in any way by the producers other than handling by boxing fish on ice, and possibly transporting.

1 a. The aquaculture producer, who harvests his or her fish and boxes them whole, on ice, for immediate transportation to a wholesaler or retailer would not be subject to the seafood HACCP regulations. Boxing and icing is, in many cases, a necessary component of delivering the aquaculture product to market. Therefore, this procedure need not constitute "processing" as defined in the regulations. However, if the producer "holds" the product after harvesting and prior to distribution, that operation would be subject to the regulations. Holding is deemed processing as defined in the HACCP regulation.

  1. The producer in the above scenario would not be subject to the seafood HACCP regulation whether he or she transported the fish to a wholesaler within the state or outside the state (interstate commerce).
  2. It would not make a difference who transports the fish. The producer of the above scenario would not be subject to the seafood HACCP regulation whether they sell their boxed, whole, cultured fish to a wholesaler at the farm site and the wholesaler transports the fish off the farm and to a retail market or if the producer does the transportation.

3 a. There are circumstances involved in the harvest, boxing, icing, transporting and/or marketing of whole, cultured fish whereby the producer engaged in any of these activities can be considered a processor and subject to seafood processor inspection regulations.

b. As stated in scenario 1:1a, if the producer, after harvesting, holds the fish before shipping it to market, he or she would be subject to the regulations. Holding is deemed processing as defined in the HACCP regulation. In addition, if the producer performs any of the other activities defined in the regulations as processing, he or she would be subject to the regulations. Such activities include, but are not limited to, heading, eviscerating, shucking, and freezing.

SCENARIO 2

There is a considerable market for live food fish in the U.S. and Canada. These fish are transported alive from production farms to wholesale and retail markets. Some fish are transported by producers to either or both marketing levels, and some fish are sold by producers to "live fish haulers" who transport and deliver fish to either or both markets. Fish may be transported and sold within state, out-of-state or in another country (Canada). The fish are not processed per se other than the handling involved with harvest, transport and delivery of live fish to market outlets.

  1. As outlined in 1-a above, the aquaculture producer who harvests his cultured fish, boxes them on ice, and transports them immediately to either in-state or out-of-state markets, would not be subject to the seafood HACCP regulations.
  2. Situations whereby the producer would be subject to the HACCP regulations are described in scenario 1:3b.

SCENARIO 3

Fish farmers not only raise fish but also "custom process" the fish for their customers when the fish are purchased on the farm. The fish may be skinned, eviscerated and/or headed in any combination of the three, based on the desire of the buyer. These customers are the end-users of these products which are not resold, that is, the customers are the consumers. Fish may be taken to some location in the same state or may be taken to another state for consumption.

  1. When a producer "custom processes" fish directly for the consumer, that part of the operation would be considered a retail establishment and therefore exempt from the seafood HACCP regulations. However, the producer must abide by the state and local laws governing retail establishments. It should be noted that some states have adopted the FDA's "Food Code." The Food Code requires that food be obtained from sources that comply with all applicable local, state, and federal statutes, regulations, and ordinances. Therefore, the states may require the producer who "custom processes," to meet food safety standards which are established in law for animal drugs, pesticides, and other chemical hazards.
  2. The "custom processed" product from the above response is still exempt from the seafood HACCP regulations even if it is transported across a State line. The transportation can be by the customer, a delivery service offered by the producer or a delivery service that is provided by common carriers.
  3. The retail establishment exemption from the seafood HACCP regulations is not contingent on how the customer pays for the services. Whether the customer purchases the fish first, then requests custom processing and pays for the processing as a separate service, or makes one payment for the combined cost of the raw fish and the custom processing charge, makes no difference to the exemption status for a retail establishment.

SCENARIO 4

Pay-lake or fee-fishing operations purchase live fish and stock them into private ponds for others to catch. These operations do not necessarily or normally raise the fish themselves. To earn extra money, some of these operations custom process fish after they have been caught by their customers. These customers are the end-users of these products which are not resold.

  1. As with a producer, the pay-lake operation which "custom processes" fish directly for the consumer, is considered a retail establishment and is therefore exempt from the seafood HACCP regulations. Again, the pay-lake operator must abide by the state and local laws governing retail establishments.

SCENARIO 5

Businesses buy live fish from producers and transport them, often through interstate commerce, alive to markets. These fish then are sold live to retail establishments that directly market these live fish to their customers.

  1. The live fish haulers are exempt under the seafood HACCP regulations since they are transporting fish without otherwise engaging in processing. However, under the FDA Food Code, the state and local regulators may require retail establishments that receive the live fish to address any safety hazards which could occur.

Aquaculture research funds available through NCRAC

Return to Table of Contents

The North Central Regional Aquaculture Center (NCRAC) will hold workshops on Sunfish Aquaculture (June 1, 1998) and Walleye Aquaculture (June 2, 1998) in Rosemont, Illinois.

Individuals who have an interest in the subjects of these workshops are invited to attend. Representatives of the regional aquaculture industry are particularly welcome. Individuals interested in the project, but unable to attend, should send an alternate to articulate their interest. The purpose is to identify interested parties who are best qualified to work on project objectives by virtue of a demonstrated record of expertise and access to facilities required in the project. These people will form a Work Group for the purpose of writing a project outline that will be submitted to NCRAC by October 1, 1998 to obtain funding. NCRAC's Board of Directors has allocated funds to be spent on this program over a two-year interval September 1, 1999 to August 31, 2001.

The workshop meetings will be chaired by Dr. Ted Batterson, NCRAC Director, Michigan State University. Anyone planning on attending the workshop must contact the director's office. This can be either in writing, telephone or fax.

Dr. Ted Batterson
NCRAC Director
Michigan State University
13 Natural Resources Bldg.
East Lansing, MI 48824
Phone: 517-353-1962
Fax: 517-353-7181

Michigan trout production down

Return to Table of Contents

Michigan's 41 commercial trout operations sold 628,000 pounds of trout during the year ending August 31, 1997. This was a decrease of 24 percent from last season. Sales were valued at $1.49 million, and included sales of foodsize trout (12 inches or longer), stockers (6 to 12 inches), fingerlings (2 to 6 inches) and eggs.

Foodsize trout had sales of 540,000 pounds with an average liveweight of 0.98 pounds per fish. The major sales outlets were direct sales to fee fishing at 43 percent of total, 16 percent to live haulers, 12 percent to restaurants and retailers, and 10 percent to processors.

Stocker trout sales totaled 75,000 pounds with an average liveweight of 0.34 pounds per trout. Fee fishing at 37 percent of sales, live haulers at 34 percent, and sales to other producers at 17 percent accounted for the majority of sales.

Number of fingerling sold was 485,000, down 31 percent from last year. The value of sales also decreased to $70,000 and averaged $5.38 per pound.

Losses of trout in Michigan amounted to 233,000 fish, weighing 54,000 pounds. Predators, disease, and theft/vandalism were among the leading causes of death, accounting for the majority of all fish lost.

Red Lake Chippewa, Univ. of Wisconsin forge aquaculture alliance

Return to Table of Contents

The Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians and the University of Wisconsin System Aquaculture Institute in Milwaukee have signed an agreement to study the potential for raising yellow perch at an aquaculture facility to be built on the Red Lake Reservation in Minnesota.

A $10,000 grant from the UW Sea Grant Institute and a matching $10,000 from the Red Lake Band will cover the cost of constructing a commercial-scale Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) unit at the UW Aquaculture Institute, which will be used to train Red Lake fisheries personnel. An additional $65,000 from Red Lake will fund the installation of a demonstration unit at Red Lake, as well as a commercial-scale system to be built in the near future.

This unique cooperative effort is designed to help revitalize the tribe's fisheries industry, boost the local economy and offer a fish-farming model for other tribes and entrepreneurs to follow. If all goes according to schedule, the tribe could begin harvesting yellow perch in the fall of 1999.

"Under the new agreement, we will combine our knowledge of the Red Lake perch biology with the Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) technology," said Fred Binkowski, aquaculture director at the UW System Wisconsin Aquatic Technology & Environmental Research Institute (WATER).

He explained the RAS unit involves raising fish in tanks, which requires extremely demanding standards of water quality and waste removal. Binkowski added that the RAS technology might prove to be the most efficient and cost-effective method of raising yellow perch in captivity.

"At our Milwaukee facility, the Red Lake personnel will learn the engineering aspects, the water quality aspects and then, perhaps most importantly, they'll be learning about the biology and intensive aquaculture of yellow perch," he said. "If all goes according to plan, we will then construct the commercial-sized operation at Red Lake and hopefully begin harvesting in the fall of 1999."

A successful RAS unit will help tribe members return to commercial fish production and will mean fish with the Red Lake label will once again grace the dinner tables of the north-central United States. Also, lessons learned through this project might open doors for others.

"This is more than a one-time shot," Binkowski said. "We already have had some contact with other tribes as well as private groups from the state, region and country interested in yellow perch aquaculture." As the Aquaculture Specialist with UW Sea Grant Advisory Services, Binkowski also has done some work on whitefish aquaculture with the Leech Lake Band in Minnesota.

Aquaculture drug approval progress in the United States

Return to Table of Contents

  • A major breakthrough has occurred in developing a new, oral antibacterial for aquaculture--Schering-Plough Animal Health has agreed to allow the development of florfenicol as a broad spectrum antibacterial for public and private aquaculture and as the model oral drug for crop grouping research. A ballot was sent on December 31, 1997 to the stakeholders in the federal-state drug approval partnership program (IAFWA Project) to vote on whether to replace sarafloxacin with florfenicol as the oral antibacterial and model drug for the crop grouping research and to respond to a confidential questionnaire to determine the priority systemic bacterial diseases. The overwhelming response has been for florfenicol to replace sarafloxacin (28 votes for, none against).
  • Western Chemical, Inc. obtained an approved New Animal Drug Application (NADA) for MS-222 or tricaine methanesulfonate (Tricaine-S®) on November 21, 1997.
  • Pfizer Animal Health has agreed to become a major player in the aquaculture drug arena.
  • Major progress was made under various partnerships and compassionate Investigational New Animal Drug (INAD) exemptions toward gaining new or amended NADAs within at least the next two to three years for the following 15 high priority drugs (with NADA sponsors in parentheses): amoxicillin (Vetrepharm Ltd. and Gurvey & Berry Co. Inc.), Aqui-S® (Aqui-S New Zealand Ltd.), chloramine-T (Akzo Nobel Chemicals Inc.), common carp pituitary (Stoller Fisheries), copper sulfate (Phelps Dodge Refining Corporation), cypermethrin (Grampian Pharmaceuticals Ltd.), erythromycin (currently confidential), formalin (amended expected soon for Western Chemical Co.; there are two other sponsors: Argent Chemical Laboratories, and Natchez Animal Supply), human chorionic gonadotropin (Intervet, Inc.; NADA expected soon), hydrogen peroxide (Eka Nobel Inc.), 17-methyltestosterone (Rangen, Inc.), MS-222 (Western Chemical, Inc.), Ovaprim® (Syndel International, Inc.), oxytetracycline (Pfizer Animal Health), and potassium permanganate (Carus Chemical Corporation). The only drug in the 1995 listing of 19 high priority drugs for approval in U.S. aquaculture that had no known activity was neomycin sulfate. Sarafloxacin development is on hold indefinitely unless a risk assessment can convince the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that the use of the drug in fish will not cause disease resistance in humans.
  • Twenty pharmaceutical and chemical companies have disclosed that they are committed to new or amended NADAs for use of their products ( in parentheses) in U.S. aquaculture: Aqui-S Ltd. (Aqui-S®), Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. (chloramine-T), Carus Chemical Corporation (potassium permanganate), Earth Science Laboratories, Inc. (EarthTec®), Eka Nobel Inc. (hydrogen peroxide), Grampian Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (cypermethrin and Peceze®), Gurvey & Berry Co. Inc. (amoxicillin), Natchez Animal Supply (formalin), Intervet, Inc. (human chorionic gonadotropin), Moore-Clarke Co. Inc. (anti-sea lice product), Novartis Animal Health (azimethiphos), Pfizer Animal Health (oxytetracycline), Phelps Dodge Refining Corporation (copper sulfate), Rangen, Inc. (17-methyltestosterone), Sanofi Sante Nutrition Animale (fumagillin), Schering-Plough Animal Health (florfenicol), Stoller Fisheries (common carp pituitary), Syndel International Inc. (GnRHa and Ovaprim®), Vetrepharm Ltd. (amoxicillin), and Western Chemical, Inc. (formalin and MS-222). In August 1997, Schering-Plough Animal Health gained approval of florfenicol (Aquaflor®) in Canada as a control of furunculosis in salmonids. Nutreco Aquaculture is pursuing development in Canada for the sea lice product, Calicide®, in Canada. These two drugs have great potential for development and approval in the United States.
  • Thirteen drugs have been added to the 1995 listing of 19 high priority drugs for approval in aquaculture and several either currently have NADA sponsors (in parentheses with potential use) who have committed to an INAD/NADA or are potential NADA sponsors: Aqui-S® (anesthetic,Aqui-S, Ltd.), azimethiphos (sea lice control, Novartis Animal Health), calcein (non-lethal marking agent, seeking sponsor), Calcide® (potentially Nutreco Aquaculture), cypermethrin (sea lice control and freshwater parasiticide, Grampian Pharmaceuticals Limited), EarthTec® (external microbicide, Earth Science Laboratories, Inc.), florfenicol (oral antibacterial, Schering-Plough Animal Health), fumagillin (myxozoan control, Sanofi Sante Nutrition Animale), GnRHa (spawning aid, Syndel International Inc.), Ovaprim® spawning aid, (Syndel International Inc.), Peceze® (fungicide, external antibacterial, Grampian Pharmaceuticals Limited), quinine (parasiticide and myxozoan control, potentially Tetra), and Salartect 500® (sea lice control, potentially Brenntag UK).
  • At least seven pharmaceutical and chemical companies ( in parentheses) are potential NADA sponsors for the following aquaculture drugs: Cutrine-Plus® (Applied Biochemists, Inc.), erythromycin (currently confidential), pet fish therapeutants (various sponsors), praziquantel (Bayer AG), quinine (Tetra), Salartect 500® (Brenntag UK), and trichlorfon (Bayer Animal Health). The only drugs in the 1995 listing of 19 high priority drugs for approval in U.S. aquaculture that experienced no known interest from pharmaceutical or chemical companies were neomycin sulfate and diquat dibromide. There are INADs, however, on those two compounds, and the aquaculture industry is interested in identifying NADA sponsors for these drugs. A sponsor for benzocaine (anesthetic) is not being pursued at this time because Aqui-S® has greater potential for a zero withdrawal period and has a sponsor who is developing their product for aquaculture. The only product from the 1995 listing of 19 high priority drugs for approval that has an inactive sponsor INAD is AquaPharm Technologies Corporation's luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRHa) product and that cancellation was for business reasons. Syndel International Inc. is pursuing approval of two of its products that can replace LHRHa-- Ovaprim® and GnRHa.
  • Most of the NADA technical sections have been submitted for copper sulfate and 17-methyltestosterone, meaning that these drugs have moved closer to approval. Portions of technical sections have also been submitted for chloramine-T and oxytetracycline.
  • Several pivotal efficacy studies on chloramine-T were successfully performed in 1997 that illustrated the compound's effectiveness in reducing mortalities associated with bacterial gill disease on salmonids.
  • Data call-ins were sent under the federal-state drug approval partnership program (IAFWA Project) to all INAD coordinators of INADs on (1) formalin on July 11, 1997 requesting that they submit efficacy data that has been generated to extend the formalin NADA for the control or prevention of mortalities associated with saprolegniasis on all cultured freshwater fish; (2) oxytetracycline on October 7, 1997 for efficacy data that will extend and expand the oxytetracycline NADA for its use to control bacterial infections on all cultured freshwater fish; and (3) chloramine-T on November 14, 1997 for efficacy data to gain approval for its use to control or prevent external flavobacterial infections on freshwater fish.
  • A report on the efficacy and toxicity of Aqui-S® was sent by coordinators of the IAFWA Project on July 18, 1997 to 37 states, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (IAFWA) for their decision on which anesthetic to pursue under the IAFWA Project. The results were 24 votes for Aqui-S® and none for benzocaine, the other candidate anesthetic.
  • Research is being conducted to demonstrate the usefulness of the crop grouping concept in order to reduce residue chemistry data requirements and costs of approvals for all present and future aquaculture drugs. Existing data will soon be compiled and submitted to CVM for an opinion on the practicality of using the crop grouping concept to fulfill residue chemistry data requirements in classes of fish rather than individual fish species.

Source: Rosalie A. Schnick, National Coordinator for Aquaculture New Animal Drug Applications, Michigan State University

Stress response in rainbow trout

Return to Table of Contents

A recent issue of the Journal of Aquatic Animal Health included a report about stress response in rainbow trout. Marko A.W. Ruis and Christopher J. Bayne of Oregon State University studied the effects of acute stress on blood clotting and yeast killing in rainbow trout. The ability of blood to clot and kill foreign organisms can be important to the survival of trout immediately following an acutely stressful event --for example, the capture and release of a trout by an angler.

Running somewhat contrary to the commonly held belief that stress is "bad," Ruis and Bayne discovered that acute stress actually decreased clotting times and increased the ability of trout blood to kill yeast cells. They explained the apparent contradiction by saying, "Persistence of stressors generally causes biological tolerance limits to be exceeded. Consequently, susceptibility to disease increases under chronic stress, when the individual is given no opportunity to escape. Stress responses to multiple acute disturbances were found to be cumulative, indicating that acute stressors probably also are immunosuppressive when experienced repeatedly, such as in routine fish hatchery procedures like handling and transport."

Apparently, stress can be positive in small and infrequent doses.

MICHIGAN SEA GRANT EXTENSION AGENTS

Return to Table of Contents