|
Sea Grant Technology
Program: Request for Proposals; for FY 1999
[Federal Register: March 5, 1999
(Volume 64, Number 43)] [Page 10640-10644]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [Docket No. 990125032-9032-01] RIN
0648-ZA58
AGENCY: National Sea Grant College Program, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of request for proposals.
SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to
advise the public that the National Sea Grant College Program (Sea Grant) is entertaining
preliminary proposals and subsequently full proposals for a technology transfer and
development program to fulfill its broad responsibilities in fostering economic
competitiveness through the transfer of technology pertaining to the development and
utilization of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes resources. In FY 1999, Sea Grant expects to
provide about $1,550,000 to support projects that can accelerate the transfer of academic
science and technology to the market. Of this amount, $800,000 will be allocated for
technologies related specifically to aquaculture. It is desirable that proposals, which
must be submitted through state Sea Grant Programs, involve industrial partners. Matching
funds equal to a minimum of 50% of the federal request must be provided. Successful
projects will be selected through national competition.
DATES: Preliminary proposals must be
submitted before 5 pm (local time) on April 5, 1999 to the nearest state Sea Grant College
Program. After evaluation at the National Sea Grant Office, some proposers will be
encouraged to prepare full proposals, which must be submitted before 5 pm (local time) on
May 27, 1999 to the nearest state Sea Grant College Program.
ADDRESSES: Preliminary proposals and full
proposals must be submitted through the nearest state Sea Grant Program. The addresses of
the Sea Grant College Program directors may be found on Sea Grant's home page (http://www.mdsg.umd.edu/NSGO/index.html)
or may also be obtained by contacting the Program Manager at the National Sea Grant Office
(see below).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Vijay G. Panchang
Program Manager
National Sea Grant College Program
R/SG, NOAA
1315 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Tel. (301) 713-2435 ext. 142
e-mail: Vijay.Panchang@noaa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Program Authority
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1121-1131.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 11.417, Sea Grant Support.)
II. Program Description
Background
The ocean environment has traditionally provided an abundance of economic opportunities
over a wide spectrum of activities. As a result of growing population pressures, the
demands to maintain a sustainable and healthy environment, and ongoing scientific
advancements, the economic potential afforded by the marine environment may be expected to
increase. On the other hand, globalization has put unprecedented demands on U.S. industry
for innovation and the development of new technologies. Economic competitiveness can be
fostered by creating opportunities for collaboration between industrial and academic
scientists and engineers, as well as by supporting post-fundamental work to accelerate the
conversion of academic research into products with commercial value.
The ``National Sea Grant College Program Reauthorization Act of 1997'' (33 U.S.C.
1121-1131) calls upon the National Sea Grant College Program (Sea Grant) to foster
economic competitiveness, invest in technology transfer, and create partnerships between
the Federal Government and universities, private industry, and other agencies in the
development and utilization of marine resources. To meet these objectives, Sea Grant's
technology program is meant to serve as a catalyst for scientific entrepreneurship and
technology transfer and thereby enhance commerce. With at least one-third of the total
cost provided as required matching funds by the grantee, Sea Grant expects to provide
federal support of approximately $1,550,000 to support new projects in 1999. The federal
request for each project, which will be of 18 months duration or less, may not exceed
$150,000.
Program Goals
To conduct focuses projects that can lead to the development and utilization of marine
resources and related technological innovations and their acceptance in the marketplace
(both in the U.S. and abroad); to increase interactions between the nation's academic
scientists and engineers and their industrial counterparts; to accelerate the transfer of
research-based marine science from universities to new technologies in industry; to
provide a mechanism for industry to influence Sea Grant research priorities and solve
problems of importance to industry; to increase cost-effectiveness of seafood production
through aquaculture; and to forge long-term relationships between Sea Grant colleges and
industrial firms.
Funding Priorities
The Sea Grant technology program provides support for applied research and development
projects that ultimately facilitate the transfer of new products and processes related to
the development of marine resources,
[[Page 10641]]
including cost reductions for processes and product safety.
Proposals must be submitted through a state Sea Grant program, but in a true partnership
that benefits national or regional economies, industrial cooperation in academic research
and development efforts could be expected and such cooperation should be sought.
University faculty are the major source for identifying potential industrial collaborators
and suitable research topics. However, other sources can be used to identify potential
industrial partners or user groups, such as the Sea Grant Marine Extension Program,
university industrial relations offices, and the Sea Grant Review Panel. Sea Grant
directors are encouraged to use a variety of sources in building successful partnerships
with industry or other user groups. Several types of projects will be considered under
this announcement. These include, for example, the following:
- Additional developmental work that can accelerate the
transition of academic research to marketplace acceptance. For example, pilot-scale
testing of technologies developed in academia may be necessary to establish economic
feasibility. A private sector partner may or may not be identified. (If the work has
imminent commercial implications and an industrial partner is involved, the partner may
reasonably be expected to provide matching funds.)
- A project which does not lead to a commercializable product
per se, but is of mutual benefit to industry and academia. For example, if industry
anticipates future trends either due to market forces or government regulations, it may
wish to prepare for them by developing technologies with help from academia. If there is
actual transfer of technologies to industry, then participation by an industrial partner
may be appropriate.
- Technology transfer or demonstration projects and workshops/
forums given by academic researchers and mainly targeted to industry, involving
registration or other fees paid by industry which can constitute industrial match.
- Technology transfer to user groups in government or other
agencies that enhances cost-effectiveness of operations.
(Proposals that will be considered under this announcement
are not limited to the above types of projects, which are given by way of example only.)
Projects in all areas of marine resource utilization and
economic development of coastal environments will be considered. (See Sea Grant's Long
Range Plan on Sea Grant's home page or that of the nearest Sea Grant College program).
Examples include biotechnology, environmental technology, fisheries and aquaculture, and
marine infrastructure. However, $800,000 will be earmarked for technologies related
specifically to projects dealing with aquaculture. The development of a robust aquaculture
industry is part of NOAA's Strategic Plan and is intended to help meet the seafood needs
of a growing population, reduce imports of fisheries products, and benefit the nation's
balance of trade. In particular, proposals are sought that deal with enabling technologies
for species with major commercial potential in the near future; areas of interest are: the
performance and cost-effectiveness of environmentally sound culture systems; license and
permit procedures; best management procedures; genetic improvement leading to reduced
production costs; production of less expensive feed delivery and utilization; stability,
palatability, and shelf-life of aquaculture products; health and disease diagnosis and
control; and related areas. A match equal to at least one-half of the federal contribution
is required for all proposals.
III. Eligibility
Applications may be submitted by individuals; public or private corporations,
partnerships, or other associations or entities (including institutions of higher
education, institutes, or non-Federal laboratories), or any State, political subdivision
of a State, or agency or officer thereof.
IV. Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation criteria for proposals submitted for support
under the Sea Grant Technology Program are:
- A. Importance of the problem and the benefits expected to the
nation due to the advancement of technology (30%).
- B. Appropriateness of methodologies to be used (30%).
- C. Potential for technology transfer to user groups such as
industry and/or for enhanced economic value. Participation (especially matching
contributions) by an industrial partner or other user groups will be viewed favorably
(30%).
- D. Qualifications of project participants (10%).
V. Selection Procedures
Preliminary proposals will be reviewed at the National Sea
Grant Office (NSGO) by a panel composed of individuals from the federal government with
expertise in industry/academic interactions and/or academia and industry. The panel will
be asked to assess each proposal based on the importance of the technology to the nation,
the potential for technology transfer to user groups and/or enhanced economic value, and
the qualifications of project participants from the viewpoint of the project. The panel
will make individual recommendations to the Director of the NSGO regarding which
preliminary proposals may be suitable for further consideration. On the basis of the
panel's recommendations, the Director of the NSGO will advise proposers whether or not the
submission of full proposals is encouraged. Invitation to submit a full proposal does not
constitute an indication that the proposal will be funded. Interested parties who are not
invited to submit full proposals will not be precluded from submitting full proposals if
they have submitted a preliminary proposal in accordance with the procedures described
below.
Full proposals will be received at the individual state Sea
Grant Programs who will conduct the mail peer review of the proposed project for
importance of the problem being addressed, scientific and technical merit, and potential
for technology transfer or enhanced economic value. Complete full proposals and their
written reviews will be sent by the state Sea Grant programs to the National Sea Grant
Office to be ranked in accordance with the assigned weights of the above evaluation
criteria by an independent peer review panel consisting of government, academic, and
industry experts. These panel members will provide individual evaluations on each
proposal, but there will be no consensus advice. Their recommendations and evaluations
will be considered by the National Sea Grant Office in the final selection. Only those
proposals rated by the panel as either Excellent, Very Good or Good will be eligible for
funding. For those proposals, the National Sea Grant Office will:
- (a) ascertain which proposals best meet the program goals, and
do not substantially duplicate other projects that are currently funded or are approved
for funding by NOAA and other federal agencies, hence, awards may not necessarily be made
to the highest-scored proposals;
- (b) select the proposals to be funded;
- (c) determine which components of the selected projects will
be funded;
- (d) determine the total duration of funding for each proposal;
and
- (e) determine the amount of funds available for each proposal.
Investigators may be asked to modify objectives, work plans, or budgets prior to final
approval of the award. Subsequent grant administration
[[Page 10642]]
procedures will be in accordance with current NOAA grants
procedures. A summary statement of the scientific review by the peer panel will be
provided to each applicant.
VI. Instructions for Application
Timetable
April 5, 1999, 5 pm (local time)--Preliminary proposals due
at state Sea Grant Program.
April 8, 1999, 5 pm EST--Preliminary proposals due at NSGO.
May 17, 1999, 5 pm (local time)--Full proposals due at state Sea Grant Program.
July 7, 1999, 5 pm EST--Full proposals due at NSGO.
October 1, 1999 (approximate)--Funds awarded to selected recipients; projects begin.
General Guidelines
Interested parties must submit a preliminary proposal, and if
invited, a full proposal through university-based Sea Grant programs for a grant to
support up to two-thirds of the total budget. The project can be for a maximum of 18
months duration. No more than $150,000 of federal funds may be requested for the project.
Allocation of matching funds, equal to at least half the federal request, must be
specified in the budget.
What to Submit
Preliminary Proposal Guidelines To prevent the expenditure of
effort that may not be successful, proposers must first submit preliminary proposals.
Preliminary proposals must be single- or double-spaced, typewritten in at least a 10-point
font, and printed on metric A4 (210 mm x 297 mm) or 8\1/2\'' x 11'' paper. The following
information should be included:
- Signed Title Page: the title page should be signed by the
Principal Investigator and should clearly identify the program area being addressed by
starting the project title with ``Sea Grant Technology Program.'' Principal Investigators
and collaborators should be identified by affiliation and contact information. The total
amount of Federal funds and matching funds being requested should be listed, as well as
the source of the matching funds. Preliminary proposals must include matching funds
equivalent to at least 50% of the Federal funds requested.
- A concise (2-page limit) description of the project that
addresses the following questions: What technology will be developed? How is it important
to the nation? What fundamental work has been done that allows advancement of this
technology to a more applied level? What are the anticipated economic benefits? Proposers
should consult the Evaluation Criteria for additional guidance in preparing the
preliminary proposals.
- Resumes (1-page limit) of the Principal Investigators.
- Proposers are encouraged (but not required) to include a
separate page suggesting reviewers that the proposers believe are especially well
qualified to review the proposal. Proposers may also designate persons they would prefer
not review the proposal, indicating why. These suggestions will be considered during the
review process.
Three copies of the preliminary proposals must be submitted
to the nearest state Sea Grant Program Director before 5 pm (local time) on April 5, 1999.
Preliminary proposals will then be forwarded by the Sea Grant Programs, along with a cover
letter, to Dr. Vijay Panchang, Program Manager, at the address below so as to reach the
National Sea Grant Office (NSGO) on or before 5 pm on April 8, 1999. No institutional
signatures or federal government forms are needed while submitting preliminary proposals.
Full Proposal Guidelines
Each full proposal should include the items listed below. All pages should be single- or
double-spaced, typewritten in at least a 10-point font, and printed on metric A4 (210 mm x
297 mm) or 8\1/2\'' x 11'' paper. Brevity will assist reviewers and program staff in
dealing effectively with proposals. Therefore, the Project Description may not exceed 15
pages. Tables and visual materials, including charts, graphs, maps, photographs and other
pictorial presentations are included in the 15-page limitation; literature citations are
not included in the 15- page limitation. Conformance to the 15-page limitation will be
strictly enforced. All information needed for review of the proposal should be included in
the main text; no appendices are permitted.
- Signed Title Page: The title page should be signed by the
Principal Investigator and the institutional representative and should clearly identify
the program area being addressed by starting the project title with ``Sea Grant Technology
Program.'' The Principal Investigator and institutional representative should be
identified by full name, title, organization, telephone number and address. The total
amount of Federal funds and matching funds being requested should be listed.
- Project Summary: This information is very important. Prior to
attending the peer review panel meetings, some of the panelists may read only the project
summary. Therefore, it is critical that the project summary accurately describe the
research being proposed and convey all essential elements of the research. The project
summary should include: 1. Title: Use the exact title as it appears in the rest of the
application. 2. Investigators: List the names and affiliations of each investigator who
will significantly contribute to the project. Start with the Principal Investigator. 3.
Funding request for each year of the project, including matching funds if appropriate. 4.
Project Period: Start and completion dates. Proposals should request a start date of
October 1, 1999. 5. Project Summary: This should include the rationale for the project,
the scientific or technical objectives and/ or hypotheses to be tested, and a brief
summary of work to be completed.
- Project Description (15-page limit):
(a) Introduction/Background/Justification: Subjects that the
investigator(s) may wish to include in this section are:
(i) Previous fundamental research and a description of what
additional work is needed to enhance the economic value of this fundamental work;
(ii) contributions that the study will make to the particular discipline or subject area;
and
(iii) significance of the proposed technology to the region and nation;
(b) Research or Technical Plan:
(i) objectives to be achieved, hypotheses to be tested;
(ii) Experimental design and statistical analysis to be used;
(iii) Plan or work--detailed methodology, collaboration with industry or other user groups
(if appropriate), and a timetable for project activities; and
(iv) Role of project personnel.
(c) Output/Anticipated Economic Benefits: This may be
measured, for example, by patents or licenses; commercializable new products (e.g.,
pharmaceutical and other products from marine biotechnology, equipment for aquaculture
operations, products used in or obtained from marine engineering operations, computer
models for simulation of marine processes, etc.); process improvements (e.g., seafood
processing, harbor design or dredging procedures, biochemical engineering, etc.);
corporate investments in academic research efforts; private sector job opportunities for
students involved in the project.
(d) Coordination with other Program Elements: Describe any coordination with other agency
programs or ongoing research efforts. Describe any other proposals that are essential to
the success of this proposal. [[Page 10643]] (e) References and Literature Citations:
Should be included but will not be counted in the 15 page project description limit.
- Budget and Budget Justification: There should be one
cumulative budget for the entire project period. Applicants are encouraged to use the Sea
Grant Budget Form 90-4, but may use their own form as long as it provides the same
information as the Sea Grant form. Subcontracts should have a separate budget page.
Matching funds must be indicated; failure to provide adequate matching funds will result
in the proposal being rejected without review. The budget should include a separate budget
justification page that itemizes all budget items in sufficient detail to enable reviewers
to evaluate the appropriateness of the funding requested. Please pay special attention to
any travel, supply or equipment budgets and provide details. Regardless of any approved
indirect cost rate applicable to the award, the maximum dollar amount of allocable
indirect costs for which the Department of Commerce will reimburse the Recipient shall be
the lesser of:
(a) The Federal share of the total allocable indirect costs
of the award based on the negotiated rate with the cognizant Federal agency as established
by audit or negotiation; or
(b) The line item amount for the Federal share of indirect costs contained in the approved
budget of the award.
- Current and Pending Support: Applicants must provide
information on all current and pending support for ongoing projects and proposals,
including subsequent funding in the case of continuing grants. All current project support
from whatever source (e.g., Federal, State or local government agencies, private
foundations, industrial or other commercial organizations) must be listed. The proposed
project and all other projects or activities requiring a portion of time of the principal
investigator and other senior personnel should be included, even if they receive no
Federal salary support from the project(s). The number of person-months per year to be
devoted to the projects must be stated, regardless of source of support. Similar
information must be provided for all proposals already submitted or submitted concurrently
to other possible sponsors, including those within NOAA.
- Vitae (2 pages maximum per investigator)
- Letter of commitment from any industrial partner, if
appropriate.
- A brief (one-page) description of the collaborating industrial
firm, if appropriate.
- Standard Application Forms: Applicants may obtain all required
application forms through the World Wide Web at http://www.mdsg.umd.edu/NSGO/research/rfp/index.html,
from the state Sea Grant Programs or from Dr. Vijay Panchang at the National Sea Grant
Office (phone: 301-713-2435 x142 or e-mail: vijay.panchang@noaa.gov). The following forms
must be included.
(a) Standard Forms 424, Application for Federal Assistance,
424A, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs; and 424B, Assurances--
Non-Construction Programs, (Rev. 4-88). Applications should clearly identify the program
area being addressed by starting the project title with either as appropriate. Please not
that both the Principal Investigator and an administrative contact should be identified in
Section 5 of the SF424. For Section 10, applicants should enter ``11.417'' for the CFDA
Number and ``Sea Grant Support'' for the title. The form must contain the original
signature of an authorized representative of the applying institution. (b) Primary
Applicant Certifications. All primary applicants must submit a completed Form CD-511,
``Certifications Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters;
Drug-Free Workplace Requirements and Lobbying,'' and the following explanation are hereby
provided:
(i) Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension. Prospective
participants (as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Section 105) are subject to 15 CFR Part 26,
``Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension'' and the related section of the certification
form prescribed above applies:
(ii) Drug-Free Workplace. Grantees (as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Section 605) are subject
to 15 CFR Part 26, Subpart F, ``Government wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace
(Grants)'' and the related section of the certification form prescribed above applies;
(iii) Anti-Lobbying. Persons (as defined at 15 CFR Part 28, Section 105) are subject to
the lobbying provisions of 31 U.S.C. 1352, ``Limitation on use of appropriated funds to
influence certain Federal contracting and financial transactions,'' and the lobbying
section of the certification form prescribed above applies to applications/bids for
grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts for more than $100,000, and loans and loan
guarantees for more than $150,000, or the single family maximum mortgage limit for
affected programs, whichever is greater; and
(iv) Anti-Lobbying Disclosures. Any applicant that has paid or will pay for lobbying using
any funds must submit an SF-LLL, ``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,'' as required under
15 CFR Part 28, Appendix B.
(c) Lower Tier Certifications. Recipients shall require
applicants/ bidders for subgrants, contracts, subcontracts, or other lower tier covered
transactions at any tier under the award to submit, if applicable, a completed Form
CD-512, ``Certifications Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary
Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transactions and Lobbying'' and disclosure form, SF-LLL,
``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.'' Form CD-512 is intended for the use of recipients
and should not be transmitted to the Department of Commerce (DOC). SF-LLL submitted by any
tier recipient of subrecipient should be submitted to DOC in accordance with the
instructions contained in the award document.
VII. How to Submit
Preliminary proposals and proposals must be submitted to the
state Sea Grant Programs according to the schedule outlined above. Although investigators
are not required to submit more than 3 copies of either preproposals or full proposals,
the normal review process requires 10 copies. Investigators are encouraged to submit
sufficient copies for the full review process if they wish all reviewers to receive color,
unusually sized (not 8.5 x 11''), or otherwise unusual materials submitted as part of the
proposal. Only three copies of the Federally required forms are needed. The addresses of
the Sea Grant College Program directors may be found on Sea Grant's World Wide Web home
page (http://www.mdsg.umd.edu/NSGO/index.html)
or may also be obtained by contacting the Program Manager
Dr. Vijay Panchang at the National Sea Grant Office
phone: 301-713-2435 x152
e-mail: vijay.panchang@noaa.gov.
Preproposals and proposals sent to the National Sea Grant Office should be addressed to:
National Sea Grant Office, R/SG,
Attn: Sea Grant Technology Program Coordinator
NOAA, Room 11828
1315 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
(phone 301- 713-2435 for express mail applications).
Applications received after the deadline and applications
that deviate from the format described above will be returned to the sender without
review. Facsimile transmissions and electronic mail submission of applications will not be
accepted.
|